How to convert keyword argument to named argument in python 2.7? -


1 फ़ाइल: 

  वर्ग प्रोफ़ाइल (वस्तु): def __init __ (स्वयं, नाम, 1st_arg = gst (), 2nd_arg = 1, 3rd_arg = AB.parallel): self.name = name self.gain = 1st_arg (i, ओ, पी) self.channel = 2nd_arg self.mode = 3rd_arg   <पी> दूसरी फाइल:  
  वर्ग ए: कुछ_फंक्शन (): 1st_arg = gst (i, o, p) # वर्ग जीएसटी कन्स्ट्रक्टर परिणाम = प्रोफ़ाइल (नाम, प्रथम_अर्ग, 2_आर्ग = 1 , 3rd_arg = चरण) # प्रोफ़ाइल वर्ग निर्माता   
 मुझे कोड से ऊपर है, लेकिन मैं "first_arg" को कीवर्ड तर्क से नामांकित तर्क में बदलना चाहता हूं।  
 यहां 2nd_arg और 3rd_arg तर्क स्पष्ट रूप से निर्दिष्ट करते हैं कि उनके मूल्यों को किस प्रकार आवंटित किया जा रहा है, लेकिन 1st_arg में ही नहीं।  
 मुझे यह परिवर्तन चाहिए ताकि यदि कोई तृतीय पक्ष मेरे कोड को देखे तो वह इसे आसानी से समझ जाएगा।   
 
 
 यदि आप एक कीवर्ड तर्क (और यह अंतिम कीवर्ड तर्क) में एक स्थितीय तर्क को परिवर्तित करना चाहते हैं, तो बस उसका नाम निर्दिष्ट करें । उदाहरण के लिए, यदि आपके पास निम्न फ़ॉर्म की कॉल है:  
  f (val1, val2, arg3 = val3, arg4 = val4)   
 और आप एक कीवर्ड तर्क के रूप में  val2  प्रदान करना चाहते हैं, बस इसे कॉल करें  
  f (val1, arg2 = val2, arg3 = val3, arg4 = val4)   
 यदि तर्क जिसे आप बदलना चाहते हैं, तो अंतिम स्थितीय तर्क नहीं है, तो आपको सभी निम्नलिखित स्थितीय तर्कों को कीवर्ड तर्कों में भी परिवर्तित करना होगा।

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

python - how we can use ajax() in views.py in django? -

I have a little code here. Could you please tell me what this code really does? please. Here in the AJAX call: $ .ajax ({url: "{% url} upload_document '%}", type: "POST", data : {Csrfmiddletoken: document.getElementsByName ('csrfmiddletoken') [0] Price, Title: document.getElementById ('title'). Value, // document: document: document.getElementById ('document'),}, datatype: "Jason", success: function (feedback) {if (feedback == "true") {// success} other {// attachment errors}}}); How AJAX works in the Django and how we can see the AJAX request. Here is the idea of ​​my thoughts def upload_document (requested): Print request. POTT print request FILES if request.is_ajax (): If request.method == 'POST': form = UploadForm (request.POST, request.FILES, user = request.user) if form.is_valid (): Form.save () return HTTPPCS (SimpleJason Dumps ('True'), Mime Type = 'App / Jason') Other:...
Read more

c - Performance of System() -

After the function in C, for the system (), it affects the hardware counters, so how do you order that The example displayed for the example you are trying to view lets the IM use the display API (PAPI) and the program is a precompiled matrix multiplication application. PAPI_start_counters (); System ("./matmul"); PAPI_read_counters (); // Print the values ​​PAPI_stop_counters (); I'm clearly missing a bit, but I'm trying to figure out what it is possible to say, counter receiving a program im running Is through use. With my tests I will get wild numbers like below, they are clearly wrong, just want to find out why total bicycle =========== 140733358872510 instructions complete =========== 4203968 Floating Point Instructions =========== Floating Point Operations =========== 4,196,867 Weight ======= ==== 140733358872804 store ======= ==== 4204037 branches taken =========== 15774436 System () Normally it is a very slow function, on Linux, it is ...
Read more

c++ - How to define methods in a base class that only work in derived classes? -

The title is slightly ambiguous, so I will say an example of what I want to achieve: Class ValuePtr {Public: Operator Canned void * () {return glm :: value_ptr (* this); // value ptr will not work on this class // (works only on glm type)}}; Square mat4x4: public glm :: mat4x4, public valuePtr {// ... but will work here}; Square Vec3: Public glm :: vec3, Public ValuePtr {// ... and here. } Is such a thing possible? glm :: value_ptr works only on glm type like glm :: mat4x4 , glm: : Vec3 , etc. The above seen method works if I implement it directly into derivative classes, but they should all be defined as operator construct * zero * in the same way. I should behave like a special behavior: define it in the general base class, whereas definition only works in derived classes. Thank you for the answer, I use this solution: template & lt; Class T & gt; Class ValuePtr: Public T {Public: Operator Constant * () {return glm :: value_ptr (* this); }}; Class ...
Read more